E2-3200 vs Celeron P4500

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron P4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads
0.55

E2-3200 outperforms Celeron P4500 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron P4500 and E2-3200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking27052657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date28 March 2010 (14 years ago)7 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$15.99 $22

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron P4500 and E2-3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus support1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron P4500 and E2-3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPGA988FM1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron P4500 and E2-3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
FMA+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron P4500 and E2-3200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron P4500 and E2-3200 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron P4500 and E2-3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsRadeon HD 6370D
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron P4500 and E2-3200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron P4500 and E2-3200.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron P4500 0.55
E2-3200 0.62
+12.7%

E2-3200 outperforms Celeron P4500 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron P4500 848
E2-3200 953
+12.4%

E2-3200 outperforms Celeron P4500 by 12% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 0.62
Recency 28 March 2010 7 September 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

The E2-3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron P4500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron P4500 is a notebook processor while E2-3200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron P4500 and E2-3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron P4500
Celeron P4500
AMD E2-3200
E2-3200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate Celeron P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 vote

Rate E2-3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron P4500 or E2-3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.