Processor N50 vs Celeron N6211
Aggregate performance score
Processor N50 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N6211 and Processor N50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2197 | 2022 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Elkhart Lake | no data |
Power efficiency | 20.58 | 27.55 |
Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Processor N50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Processor N50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | BGA1493 | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Processor N50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N6211 and Processor N50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Processor N50 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Processor N50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Processor N50.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.44 | 1.78 |
Integrated graphics card | 1.39 | 2.29 |
Recency | 17 July 2022 | 3 January 2023 |
Processor N50 has a 23.6% higher aggregate performance score, 64.7% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 5 months.
The Processor N50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Processor N50 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Processor N50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.