Processor N50 vs Celeron N5105
Aggregate performance score
Celeron N5105 outperforms Processor N50 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N5105 and Processor N50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1751 | 2039 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 24.13 | 27.44 |
Architecture codename | Jasper Lake (2021) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N5105 and Processor N50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N5105 and Processor N50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1338 | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N5105 and Processor N50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | - | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N50 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 750 MHz) |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 24 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5105 and Processor N50 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N50 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N50 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N50.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 8 | 9 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 14 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.55 | 1.74 |
Integrated graphics card | 5.58 | 2.30 |
Recency | 11 January 2021 | 3 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron N5105 has a 46.6% higher aggregate performance score, 142.6% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Processor N50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
The Celeron N5105 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N50 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron N5105 is a desktop processor while Processor N50 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5105 and Processor N50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.