Ultra 7 265 vs Celeron N6211

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Core Ultra 7 265 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2209not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesElkhart Lakeno data
Power efficiency20.42no data
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$54no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Core Ultra 7 265 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Core Ultra 7 265 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA14931851
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Core Ultra 7 265. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+

Security technologies

Celeron N6211 and Core Ultra 7 265 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Core Ultra 7 265 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Core Ultra 7 265. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Core Ultra 7 265.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron N6211 has 983.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Core Ultra 7 265. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Core Ultra 7 265, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
Core Ultra 7 265

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Core Ultra 7 265, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.