5 210H vs Celeron N6211
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N6211 and Core 5 210H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2214 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | no data |
| Power efficiency | 20.53 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) | 18 December 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | $342 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Core 5 210H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Core 5 210H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1493 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Core 5 210H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N6211 and Core 5 210H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Core 5 210H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Core 5 210H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz) | Iris Xe Graphics 48EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Core 5 210H.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 July 2022 | 18 December 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has 650% lower power consumption.
5 210H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 300% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Core 5 210H. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Core 5 210H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Core 5 210H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
