Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs N6211

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2092	2681
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.51	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	Elkhart Lake	Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codename	Elkhart Lake	Merom (2006−2008)
Release date	17 July 2022 (1 year ago)	1 May 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$54	no data
Current price	$240 (4.4x MSRP)	$66

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	1.2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3 GHz	1.66 GHz
Bus support	no data	667 MHz
L2 cache	1.5 MB	1 MB
Chip lithography	10 nm	65 nm
Die size	no data	143 mm2
Number of transistors	no data	291 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	BGA1493	PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	6.5 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR4

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

N6211 outperforms Dual-Core T1600 by 138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.45	0.61
Recency	17 July 2022	1 May 2008
Chip lithography	10 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---