Athlon II X2 245 vs Celeron N6211

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41
+101%
Athlon II X2 245
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.70

Celeron N6211 outperforms Athlon II X2 245 by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Athlon II X2 245 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21982703
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.335.89
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesElkhart Lakeno data
Power efficiency20.531.02
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)23 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54$35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X2 245 has 77% better value for money than Celeron N6211.

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Athlon II X2 245 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Athlon II X2 245 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1493AM3
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Athlon II X2 245. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Athlon II X2 245. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Athlon II X2 245.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N6211 1.41
+101%
Athlon II X2 245 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
+102%
Athlon II X2 245 1110

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 0.70
Recency 17 July 2022 23 July 2009
Chip lithography 10 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron N6211 has a 101.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N6211 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 245 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Athlon II X2 245, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD Athlon II X2 245
Athlon II X2 245

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 323 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 245 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Athlon II X2 245, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.