Ryzen 5 3600XT vs Celeron N4020

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4020
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.01
Ryzen 5 3600XT
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
12.18
+1106%

Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Celeron N4020 by a whopping 1106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2470655
Place by popularity83not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.37
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency15.3511.69
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)16 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate15 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache4 MB3 MB
L3 cache4 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090AM4
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600-
Max video memory8 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency650 MHz-
Execution Units12-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz-
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12-
OpenGL4.4-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4020 1.01
Ryzen 5 3600XT 12.18
+1106%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N4020 1551
Ryzen 5 3600XT 18638
+1102%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N4020 343
Ryzen 5 3600XT 1721
+402%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N4020 547
Ryzen 5 3600XT 7190
+1214%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 12.18
Recency 4 November 2019 16 June 2020
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron N4020 has 1483.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3600XT, on the other hand, has a 1105.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 months, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3600XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4020 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N4020 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3600XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4020 and Ryzen 5 3600XT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
Ryzen 5 3600XT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1755 votes

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 537 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4020 or Ryzen 5 3600XT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.