EPYC Embedded 3255 vs Celeron N4020

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2469not rated
Place by popularity83not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency15.35no data
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate15 MHzno data
Multiplierno data25
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB512 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes632
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 November 2019 21 February 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 55 Watt

Celeron N4020 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 816.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3255, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N4020 is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 3255 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4020 and EPYC Embedded 3255, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020
AMD EPYC Embedded 3255
EPYC Embedded 3255

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1753 votes

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 3255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4020 or EPYC Embedded 3255, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.