Atom x5-Z8330 vs Celeron N4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.95
+82.7%

Celeron N4000 outperforms Atom x5-Z8330 by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24052757
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameGemini Lake (2019)Airmont (2015−2016)
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$305 (2.9x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.92 GHz
L1 cache112 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB2 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature105 deg C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1090no data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3L-RS 1600
Maximum memory size8 GB2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s12.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHz500 MHz
Execution Units1212

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes61
USB revision2.0/3.03.0
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N4000 0.95
+82.7%
Atom x5-Z8330 0.52

Celeron N4000 outperforms Atom x5-Z8330 by 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N4000 1472
+82%
Atom x5-Z8330 809

Celeron N4000 outperforms Atom x5-Z8330 by 82% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N4000 324
+78%
Atom x5-Z8330 182

Celeron N4000 outperforms Atom x5-Z8330 by 78% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N4000 533
Atom x5-Z8330 570
+6.9%

Atom x5-Z8330 outperforms Celeron N4000 by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 0.52
Recency 11 December 2017 8 February 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4

The Celeron N4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8330 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N4000 and Atom x5-Z8330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Atom x5-Z8330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 822 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N4000 or Atom x5-Z8330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.