Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs Celeron N3450

Aggregated performance score

Celeron N3450
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
1.28
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020
64 cores / 128 threads
54.12
+4128%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by a whopping 4128% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking216921
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.61
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2016 (7 years ago)14 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$5,500
Current price$242 (2.3x MSRP)$6509 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500-
Max video memory8 GB-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency700 MHz-
Execution Units12-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+-
OpenGL+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes6128
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3450 1.28
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 54.12
+4128%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 4128% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N3450 1984
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 83709
+4119%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 4119% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3450 239
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 1598
+569%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 569% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3450 666
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 14771
+2118%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 2118% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron N3450 1415
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 5596
+295%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 295% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N3450 3959
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 52743
+1232%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 1232% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N3450 2576
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 16656
+547%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 547% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron N3450 22.31
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 6.11
+265%

Celeron N3450 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX by 265% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron N3450 2
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 54
+2804%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 2804% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N3450 143
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 9706
+6687%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 6687% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N3450 45
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 195
+338%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 338% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron N3450 0.53
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 2.12
+300%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 300% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3450 1.2
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 26
+2067%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 2067% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3450 1020
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 6689
+556%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 556% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3450 58
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 264
+354%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 354% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3450 12
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 193
+1504%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Celeron N3450 by 1504% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 54.12
Recency 1 September 2016 14 July 2020
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Cost $107 $5500
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 280 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3450 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3450 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 147 votes

Rate Celeron N3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 822 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3450 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.