Core i9-14900KF vs Celeron N3450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3450
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.28

i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron N3450 by a whopping 2934% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking219669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data84.45
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)no data
Release date30 August 2016 (7 years ago)1 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$242 (2.3x MSRP)$514

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.8 GHz
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB36 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)6 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes620
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3450 1.28
i9-14900KF 38.83
+2934%

Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron N3450 by 2934% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N3450 1978
i9-14900KF 60053
+2936%

Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron N3450 by 2936% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3450 240
i9-14900KF 3094
+1189%

Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron N3450 by 1189% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3450 665
i9-14900KF 20852
+3036%

Core i9-14900KF outperforms Celeron N3450 by 3036% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 38.83
Recency 30 August 2016 1 October 2023
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 32

The Core i9-14900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3450 is a notebook processor while Core i9-14900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3450 and Core i9-14900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450
Intel Core i9-14900KF
Core i9-14900KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 147 votes

Rate Celeron N3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 242 votes

Rate Core i9-14900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3450 or Core i9-14900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.