i3-2375M vs Celeron N3450

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3450
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.25
+119%
Core i3-2375M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.57

Celeron N3450 outperforms Core i3-2375M by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22972816
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i3
Power efficiency19.723.17
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)3 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$250

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier1115
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data149 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data624 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500Intel HD Graphics 3000 (350 - 1000 MHz)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz1 GHz
Execution Units12no data
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSI+no data
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3450 1.25
+119%
i3-2375M 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3450 1987
+120%
i3-2375M 903

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N3450 244
+7.5%
i3-2375M 227

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N3450 677
+39%
i3-2375M 487

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N3450 1415
i3-2375M 1978
+39.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N3450 3959
i3-2375M 4432
+11.9%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N3450 22.31
+66.3%
i3-2375M 37.11

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N3450 2
+30.8%
i3-2375M 1

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron N3450 0.53
i3-2375M 0.56
+5.7%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Celeron N3450 1.2
+823%
i3-2375M 0.1

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Celeron N3450 12
+50.4%
i3-2375M 8

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Celeron N3450 58
+32.6%
i3-2375M 44

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 0.57
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.66
Recency 30 August 2016 3 February 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron N3450 has a 119.3% higher aggregate performance score, 16.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 183.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N3450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2375M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3450 and Core i3-2375M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450
Intel Core i3-2375M
Core i3-2375M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 152 votes

Rate Celeron N3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 15 votes

Rate Core i3-2375M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3450 or Core i3-2375M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.