Core i7-8565U vs Celeron N3350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3350
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.72
Core i7-8565U
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
3.94
+447%

i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by a whopping 447% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25941369
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date1 September 2016 (7 years ago)1 October 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$24$409
Current price$251 (10.5x MSRP)$985 (2.4x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data123 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1528
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-+
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data37.5 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500Intel® UHD Graphics for 8th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory8 GB32 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency650 MHz1.15 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+12
OpenGL+4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3350 0.72
i7-8565U 3.94
+447%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 447% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N3350 1108
i7-8565U 6099
+450%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 450% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3350 252
i7-8565U 804
+219%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 219% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3350 414
i7-8565U 2327
+462%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 462% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron N3350 1490
i7-8565U 6644
+346%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 346% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N3350 2654
i7-8565U 16760
+531%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 531% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N3350 1655
i7-8565U 6158
+272%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 272% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron N3350 45.5
i7-8565U 9.55
+376%

Celeron N3350 outperforms Core i7-8565U by 376% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron N3350 1
i7-8565U 7
+513%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 513% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N3350 85
i7-8565U 609
+616%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 616% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N3350 46
i7-8565U 173
+276%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 276% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron N3350 0.59
i7-8565U 1.93
+227%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 227% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3350 0.7
i7-8565U 4
+515%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 515% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3350 616
i7-8565U 4292
+597%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 597% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3350 6
i7-8565U 34
+444%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 444% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N3350 33
i7-8565U 141
+334%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 334% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Celeron N3350 2468
i7-8565U 12303
+399%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 399% in Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Celeron N3350 1328
i7-8565U 3851
+190%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 190% in Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Celeron N3350 2589
i7-8565U 13618
+426%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 426% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Celeron N3350 1500
i7-8565U 4759
+217%

Core i7-8565U outperforms Celeron N3350 by 217% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 3.94
Recency 1 September 2016 1 October 2018
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Cost $24 $409
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

The Core i7-8565U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Core i7-8565U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
Intel Core i7-8565U
Core i7-8565U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 902 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 538 votes

Rate Core i7-8565U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350 or Core i7-8565U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.