Core i3-13100 vs Celeron N3350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3350
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.72
Core i3-13100
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 60 Watt
9.47
+1215%

i3-13100 outperforms Celeron N3350 by a whopping 1215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2594759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.49
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Raptor Lake-S
Release date1 September 2016 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$24no data
Current price$251 (10.5x MSRP)$128

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1296FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-no data
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusLaunchedLaunched
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
OS Guard++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500Intel UHD Graphics 730
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency650 MHz1.5 GHz
Execution Units1224

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+12
OpenGL+4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes620
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3350 0.72
i3-13100 9.47
+1215%

Core i3-13100 outperforms Celeron N3350 by 1215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N3350 1108
i3-13100 14651
+1222%

Core i3-13100 outperforms Celeron N3350 by 1222% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3350 253
i3-13100 2253
+791%

Core i3-13100 outperforms Celeron N3350 by 791% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3350 416
i3-13100 7368
+1671%

Core i3-13100 outperforms Celeron N3350 by 1671% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 9.47
Recency 1 September 2016 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 60 Watt

The Core i3-13100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3350 is a notebook processor while Core i3-13100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Core i3-13100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
Intel Core i3-13100
Core i3-13100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 902 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 318 votes

Rate Core i3-13100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350 or Core i3-13100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.