Core Ultra 7 165H vs Celeron N3350
Aggregate performance score
Ultra 7 165H outperforms Celeron N3350 by a whopping 2244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2594 | 353 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Meteor Lake-H |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2016) | Meteor Lake-H |
| Release date | 1 September 2016 (7 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $24 | no data |
| Current price | $251 (10.5x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 22 |
| Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1296 | FCBGA2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| HD Audio | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| MPX | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | + |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | - | no data |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 96 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 500 | Intel® Arc™ graphics |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 650 MHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 4 |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | + | 12.2 |
| OpenGL | + | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 28 |
| PCI support | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core Ultra 7 165H outperforms Celeron N3350 by 2244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core Ultra 7 165H outperforms Celeron N3350 by 2257% in Passmark.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core Ultra 7 165H outperforms Celeron N3350 by 3008% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Benchmark coverage: 15%
Core Ultra 7 165H outperforms Celeron N3350 by 459% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.72 | 16.88 |
| Recency | 1 September 2016 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 22 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 28 Watt |
The Core Ultra 7 165H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3350 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Core Ultra 7 165H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
