i9-9820X vs Celeron N3160

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3160
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.75
Core i9-9820X
2018
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
12.72
+1596%

Core i9-9820X outperforms Celeron N3160 by a whopping 1596% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2654597
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.80
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i9
Power efficiency17.747.30
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)19 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$898

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeIDIDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data33
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C92 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85.33 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Braswell)N/A
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency640 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes444
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3160 0.75
i9-9820X 12.72
+1596%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3160 1187
i9-9820X 20210
+1603%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 12.72
Recency 15 January 2016 19 October 2018
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 165 Watt

Celeron N3160 has 2650% lower power consumption.

i9-9820X, on the other hand, has a 1596% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

The Core i9-9820X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3160 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3160 is a notebook processor while Core i9-9820X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3160 and Core i9-9820X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3160
Celeron N3160
Intel Core i9-9820X
Core i9-9820X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 195 votes

Rate Celeron N3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 44 votes

Rate Core i9-9820X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3160 or Core i9-9820X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.