Celeron 2955U vs N3160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3160
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.76
+33.3%

N3160 outperforms 2955U by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25492715
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date1 April 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$288 (2.7x MSRP)$197

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data118 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP--
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Smart Connect-+
FDIno data-
AMTno data9.5
Matrix Storageno data-
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
HD Audio++
RST-+

Security technologies

Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard--
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d--
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Braswell)Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency640 MHz1 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes410
PCI supportno data-
USB revision2.0/3.03.0
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Integrated IDEno data-
Number of USB ports54
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3160 0.76
+33.3%
Celeron 2955U 0.57

N3160 outperforms 2955U by 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N3160 1178
+34.3%
Celeron 2955U 877

N3160 outperforms 2955U by 34% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3160 168
Celeron 2955U 265
+57.7%

2955U outperforms N3160 by 58% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N3160 501
+10.4%
Celeron 2955U 454

N3160 outperforms 2955U by 10% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 0.57
Recency 1 April 2016 1 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

The Celeron N3160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 2955U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3160 and Celeron 2955U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3160
Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron 2955U
Celeron 2955U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 194 votes

Rate Celeron N3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 60 votes

Rate Celeron 2955U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3160 or Celeron 2955U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.