Xeon Gold 6442Y vs Celeron N3150
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 6442Y outperforms Celeron N3150 by a whopping 4854% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2959 | 140 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.06 | 17.48 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 15.82 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Braswell (2015−2016) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 April 2015 (10 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $2,065 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Gold 6442Y has 29033% better value for money than Celeron N3150.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron N3150 and Xeon Gold 6442Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.08 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | IDI | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 60 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 79 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N3150 and Xeon Gold 6442Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3150 and Xeon Gold 6442Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | - | no data |
| HD Audio | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N3150 and Xeon Gold 6442Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | - | + |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3150 and Xeon Gold 6442Y are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | - | no data |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3150 and Xeon Gold 6442Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series | no data |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 640 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 12 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3150 and Xeon Gold 6442Y integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron N3150 and Xeon Gold 6442Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | + | no data |
| OpenGL | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3150 and Xeon Gold 6442Y.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 80 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.67 | 33.19 |
| Recency | 1 April 2015 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 24 |
| Threads | 4 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 225 Watt |
Celeron N3150 has 3650% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6442Y, on the other hand, has a 4853.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.
The Intel Xeon Gold 6442Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N3150 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron N3150 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6442Y is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
