Xeon Gold 6326 vs Celeron N3050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Seriesno data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes464
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3050 587
Xeon Gold 6326 35270
+5909%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 185 Watt

Celeron N3050 has 2983.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6326, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N3050 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6326 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3050 and Xeon Gold 6326, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3050
Celeron N3050
Intel Xeon Gold 6326
Xeon Gold 6326

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 522 votes

Rate Celeron N3050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 19 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3050 or Xeon Gold 6326, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.