Xeon Platinum 8368 vs Celeron N3050

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3050
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.37
Xeon Platinum 8368
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
57.95
+15562%

Xeon Platinum 8368 outperforms Celeron N3050 by a whopping 15562% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking304119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.8420.31
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)38
Threads276
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB57 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Seriesno data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes464
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3050 0.37
Xeon Platinum 8368 57.95
+15562%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3050 588
Xeon Platinum 8368 92054
+15555%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 57.95
Recency 1 April 2015 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 38
Threads 2 76
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 270 Watt

Celeron N3050 has 4400% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8368, on the other hand, has a 15562.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 1800% more physical cores and 3700% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3050 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3050 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8368 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3050 and Xeon Platinum 8368, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3050
Celeron N3050
Intel Xeon Platinum 8368
Xeon Platinum 8368

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 552 votes

Rate Celeron N3050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 100 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8368 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3050 or Xeon Platinum 8368, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.