Ultra 7 265K vs Celeron N3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3000
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.39
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.05
+9400%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms Celeron N3000 by a whopping 9400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking301688
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data94.05
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency9.2328.05
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data12
Threads220
Base clock speed1.04 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.08 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 SeriesIntel® Graphics
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHz2 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+12
OpenGL+4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes420
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3000 0.39
Ultra 7 265K 37.05
+9400%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3000 626
Ultra 7 265K 58853
+9301%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 37.05
Recency 1 April 2015 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 2 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron N3000 has 3025% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has a 9400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N3000 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3000 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3000
Celeron N3000
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 22 votes

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 90 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3000 or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.