Core 2 Duo L7400 vs Celeron N3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3000
2015, $107
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.37
+27.6%

Celeron N3000 outperforms Core 2 Duo L7400 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33243413
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency3.900.72
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)no data
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)1 July 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3000 and Core 2 Duo L7400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads2no data
Base clock speed1.04 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.08 GHzno data
Bus typeIDIno data
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB4 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3000 and Core 2 Duo L7400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1170PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3000 and Core 2 Duo L7400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
FSB parityno data-
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3000 and Core 2 Duo L7400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3000 and Core 2 Duo L7400 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3000 and Core 2 Duo L7400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Seriesno data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3000 and Core 2 Duo L7400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3000 and Core 2 Duo L7400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3000 and Core 2 Duo L7400.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron N3000 0.37
+27.6%
Core 2 Duo L7400 0.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron N3000 646
+25.2%
Samples: 31
Core 2 Duo L7400 516
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 0.29
Recency 1 April 2015 1 July 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron N3000 has a 28% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 364% more advanced lithography process, and 325% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron N3000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo L7400 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 23 votes

Rate Celeron N3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo L7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron N3000 and Core 2 Duo L7400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.