Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 vs Celeron N2940

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2737not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronPentium 4-M
Power efficiency8.86no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.83 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nm130 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency854 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N2940 2191
+253%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 620

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N2940 29.2
+746%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 247

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 30 Watt

Celeron N2940 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 490.9% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2940 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2940
Celeron N2940
Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 99 votes

Rate Celeron N2940 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2940 or Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.