Athlon II N370 vs Celeron N2920

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron N2920
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
0.61
+5.2%
Athlon II N370
2010
2 cores / 2 threads
0.58

Celeron N2920 outperforms Athlon II N370 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26502673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Athlon II
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)16 December 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$278 (2.6x MSRP)no data

Technical specs

Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus supportno data3200 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data117.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data234 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170S1
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR3-1066 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
AES-NI-no data
VirusProtectno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency844 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2920 0.61
+5.2%
Athlon II N370 0.58

Celeron N2920 outperforms Athlon II N370 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N2920 950
+5.7%
Athlon II N370 899

Celeron N2920 outperforms Athlon II N370 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.61 0.58
Recency 1 December 2013 16 December 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2920 and Athlon II N370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2920
Celeron N2920
AMD Athlon II N370
Athlon II N370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 30 votes

Rate Celeron N2920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Athlon II N370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2920 or Athlon II N370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.