Celeron G6900T vs N2910

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2910
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.51
Celeron G6900T
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
2.62
+414%

Celeron G6900T outperforms Celeron N2910 by a whopping 414% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28841736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency6.646.83
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Connect+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8.79 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency756 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes420
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2910 0.51
Celeron G6900T 2.62
+414%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2910 778
Celeron G6900T 4003
+415%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 2.62
Recency 11 September 2013 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron N2910 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 400% lower power consumption.

Celeron G6900T, on the other hand, has a 413.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 years.

The Celeron G6900T is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2910 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N2910 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2910 and Celeron G6900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2910
Celeron N2910
Intel Celeron G6900T
Celeron G6900T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Celeron N2910 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 676 votes

Rate Celeron G6900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2910 or Celeron G6900T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.