UHD Graphics 630 vs Celeron N2840

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3041not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel UHD Graphics
Power efficiency5.01no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Gen9.5
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.16 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz0.35 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GB65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 630 has a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2840 and UHD Graphics 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 660 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 95 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2840 or UHD Graphics 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.