Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Celeron N2840

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2840
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.37
Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 45 Watt
14.48
+3814%

Ryzen 5 8645HS outperforms Celeron N2840 by a whopping 3814% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2840 and Ryzen 5 8645HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3039497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency4.9830.29
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2840 and Ryzen 5 8645HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed2.16 GHz4.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2840 and Ryzen 5 8645HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FP8
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2840 and Ryzen 5 8645HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N2840 and Ryzen 5 8645HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2840 and Ryzen 5 8645HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2840 and Ryzen 5 8645HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2840 and Ryzen 5 8645HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2840 and Ryzen 5 8645HS.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes420
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2840 0.37
Ryzen 5 8645HS 14.48
+3814%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2840 588
Ryzen 5 8645HS 22997
+3811%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N2840 1510
Ryzen 5 8645HS 14055
+831%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N2840 76
Ryzen 5 8645HS 2094
+2655%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2840 38
Ryzen 5 8645HS 270
+611%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 14.48
Integrated graphics card 0.77 14.94
Recency 22 May 2014 6 December 2023
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron N2840 has 542.9% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 8645HS, on the other hand, has a 3813.5% higher aggregate performance score, 1840.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 8645HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2840 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2840 and Ryzen 5 8645HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
Ryzen 5 8645HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 660 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 167 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8645HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2840 or Ryzen 5 8645HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.