i9-13900KF vs Celeron N2840

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2840
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.37
Core i9-13900KF
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
36.33
+9719%

Core i9-13900KF outperforms Celeron N2840 by a whopping 9719% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2840 and Core i9-13900KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking304496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.66
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i9
Power efficiency5.0313.67
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2840 and Core i9-13900KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads232
Base clock speed2.16 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache56K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2840 and Core i9-13900KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2840 and Core i9-13900KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Connect+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N2840 and Core i9-13900KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2840 and Core i9-13900KF are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2840 and Core i9-13900KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/s89.604 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2840 and Core i9-13900KF integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2840 and Core i9-13900KF.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes420
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2840 0.37
i9-13900KF 36.33
+9719%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2840 587
i9-13900KF 58185
+9812%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N2840 177
i9-13900KF 2919
+1549%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N2840 296
i9-13900KF 19633
+6533%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 36.33
Recency 22 May 2014 27 September 2022
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron N2840 has 1685.7% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KF, on the other hand, has a 9718.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Core i9-13900KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2840 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N2840 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2840 and Core i9-13900KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840
Intel Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 667 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 645 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2840 or Core i9-13900KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.