Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Celeron N2830

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2830
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.34
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
50.29
+14691%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Celeron N2830 by a whopping 14691% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking305534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency4.6017.00
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)7 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed2.16 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.41 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache56K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170TR4
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB256 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidthno data102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency750 MHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2830 0.34
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 50.29
+14691%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2830 548
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 79889
+14478%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N2830 165
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 1622
+883%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N2830 278
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 14186
+5003%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 50.29
Recency 23 February 2014 7 February 2020
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron N2830 has 3900% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, on the other hand, has a 14691.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2830 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron N2830 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2830
Celeron N2830
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 238 votes

Rate Celeron N2830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1118 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2830 or Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.