Ryzen Embedded 8840U vs Celeron N2830
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Hawk Point (2024) |
Release date | 23 February 2014 (10 years ago) | 2 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.41 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | FP8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Smart Connect | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series | AMD Radeon 780M |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | 20 |
USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 23 February 2014 | 2 April 2024 |
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 2 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 28 Watt |
Celeron N2830 has 300% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Embedded 8840U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2830 and Ryzen Embedded 8840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.