Xeon Gold 5520+ vs Celeron N2807
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5520+ outperforms Celeron N2807 by a whopping 12318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3327 | 107 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | 23.68 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.96 | 7.18 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| Release date | 23 February 2014 (11 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $1,640 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon Gold 5520+ has 236700% better value for money than Celeron N2807.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2807 and Xeon Gold 5520+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 1.58 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 52.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2807 and Xeon Gold 5520+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.3 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2807 and Xeon Gold 5520+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | + | no data |
| RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N2807 and Xeon Gold 5520+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2807 and Xeon Gold 5520+ are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2807 and Xeon Gold 5520+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | N/A |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2807 and Xeon Gold 5520+ integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2807 and Xeon Gold 5520+.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 80 |
| USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.28 | 34.77 |
| Recency | 23 February 2014 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 28 |
| Threads | 2 | 56 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 205 Watt |
Celeron N2807 has 5025% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5520+, on the other hand, has a 12317.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Gold 5520+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N2807 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron N2807 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5520+ is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
