Ryzen 7 2700 vs Celeron N2807

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.65
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Zen+ (2018−2020)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)19 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$299
Current price$251 (2.3x MSRP)$177 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.58 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170AM4
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
StatusLaunchedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size4 GB64 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency750 MHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes420
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N2807 505
Ryzen 7 2700 15707
+3010%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 3010% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N2807 142
Ryzen 7 2700 1113
+684%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 684% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron N2807 240
Ryzen 7 2700 5494
+2189%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 2189% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron N2807 986
Ryzen 7 2700 4505
+357%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 357% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron N2807 2093
Ryzen 7 2700 31385
+1400%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 1400% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron N2807 57.4
Ryzen 7 2700 5.14
+1017%

Celeron N2807 outperforms Ryzen 7 2700 by 1017% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron N2807 1
Ryzen 7 2700 17
+2994%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 2994% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N2807 65
Ryzen 7 2700 1551
+2286%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 2286% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Celeron N2807 35
Ryzen 7 2700 161
+360%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 360% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Celeron N2807 0.26
Ryzen 7 2700 1.78
+585%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 585% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2807 0.1
Ryzen 7 2700 9
+12757%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 12757% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2807 408
Ryzen 7 2700 4440
+988%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 988% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2807 3
Ryzen 7 2700 90
+2748%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 2748% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Celeron N2807 17
Ryzen 7 2700 196
+1050%

Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron N2807 by 1050% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2014 19 April 2018
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Cost $107 $299
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2807 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2807 and Ryzen 7 2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2807
Celeron N2807
AMD Ryzen 7 2700
Ryzen 7 2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 33 votes

Rate Celeron N2807 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2898 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2807 or Ryzen 7 2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.