Core i7-11700 vs Atom N2800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated559
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.62
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Rocket Lake (2021)
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)16 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data
Current price$253 (5.4x MSRP)$235

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2276 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPPno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size4.88 GB128 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data50 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650Intel UHD Graphics 750
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom N2800 444
i7-11700 19788
+4357%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Atom N2800 by 4357% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom N2800 648
i7-11700 9493
+1365%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Atom N2800 by 1365% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom N2800 1829
i7-11700 51493
+2715%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Atom N2800 by 2715% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom N2800 965
i7-11700 14738
+1427%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Atom N2800 by 1427% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom N2800 54.3
i7-11700 4.19
+1196%

Atom N2800 outperforms Core i7-11700 by 1196% in wPrime 32.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom N2800 0.1
i7-11700 12
+23900%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Atom N2800 by 23900% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom N2800 625
i7-11700 5962
+854%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Atom N2800 by 854% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom N2800 4
i7-11700 93
+2437%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Atom N2800 by 2437% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom N2800 20
i7-11700 267
+1256%

Core i7-11700 outperforms Atom N2800 by 1256% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 16 March 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2800 is a notebook processor while Core i7-11700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and Core i7-11700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800
Intel Core i7-11700
Core i7-11700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 99 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 817 votes

Rate Core i7-11700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2800 or Core i7-11700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.