Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs Celeron N2807

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronMobile Athlon 64
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)August 2005 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data
Current price$251 (2.3x MSRP)$30

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.58 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)128K
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nmno data
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170754
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
StatusLaunchedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N2807 505
+51.7%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 333

Celeron N2807 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ by 52% in Passmark.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron N2807 57.4
+47.2%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 84.5

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ outperforms Celeron N2807 by 47% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 62 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2807 and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2807
Celeron N2807
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 31 vote

Rate Celeron N2807 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2807 or Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.