Atom N2850 vs Celeron N2807

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3109not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency7.33no data
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date23 February 2014 (10 years ago)5 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.58 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170no data
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt6,6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2014 5 January 2012
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N2807 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

Atom N2850, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2807 and Atom N2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2807
Celeron N2807
Intel Atom N2850
Atom N2850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 36 votes

Rate Celeron N2807 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Atom N2850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2807 or Atom N2850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.