EPYC 7663 vs Celeron N2805

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated26
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Milan (2021)
Release date11 September 2013 (10 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$6,366
Current price$130 (1.2x MSRP)$15069 (2.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads2112
Base clock speed1.46 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1170SP3
Power consumption (TDP)4.3 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesN/A
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes4128
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N2805 335
EPYC 7663 82087
+24404%

EPYC 7663 outperforms Celeron N2805 by 24404% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2013 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 56
Threads 2 112
Cost $107 $6366
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 240 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2805 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7663 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2805 and EPYC 7663, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805
AMD EPYC 7663
EPYC 7663

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 93 votes

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7663 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2805 or EPYC 7663, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.