Xeon Bronze 3508U vs Celeron M U3600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M U3600 and Xeon Bronze 3508U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)no data
Release date18 December 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3600 and Xeon Bronze 3508U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MB22.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data83 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3600 and Xeon Bronze 3508U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA1288FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3600 and Xeon Bronze 3508U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M U3600 and Xeon Bronze 3508U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3600 and Xeon Bronze 3508U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3600 and Xeon Bronze 3508U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3600 and Xeon Bronze 3508U.

PCIe versionno data4
PCI Express lanesno data80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 December 2010 1 October 2023
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 125 Watt

Celeron M U3600 has 594.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3508U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M U3600 and Xeon Bronze 3508U. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M U3600 is a notebook processor while Xeon Bronze 3508U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3600 and Xeon Bronze 3508U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M U3600
Celeron M U3600
Intel Xeon Bronze 3508U
Xeon Bronze 3508U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3508U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M U3600 or Xeon Bronze 3508U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.