Pentium M 705 vs Celeron M P4600

Place in the ranking	2835	3304
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron M	Pentium M
Power efficiency	1.51	0.58
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Banias (2003)
Release date	1 October 2010 (14 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	no data	1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	2 GHz	1.5 GHz
Bus rate	2500 MHz	400 MHz
L1 cache	128 KB	no data
L2 cache	512 KB	no data
L3 cache	2 MB	1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	130 nm
Die size	81+114 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	382+177 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	no data	0.956V-1.484V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PGA988	H-PBGA479, PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	24.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	-
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
PAE	no data	32 Bit
FSB parity	no data	-

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705 are enumerated here.

VT-x

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M P4600 0.56
+273%

Pentium M 705 0.15

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M P4600 34.29
+244%

Pentium M 705 118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.56	0.15
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	24 Watt

Celeron M P4600 has a 273.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 705, on the other hand, has 45.8% lower power consumption.

The Celeron M P4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 705 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Pentium M 705, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.