A4-9120C vs Celeron M P4500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M P4500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64
+14.3%

Celeron M P4500 outperforms A4-9120C by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4500 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27692834
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.678.51
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 April 2010 (14 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4500 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size81+114 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4500 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA988BGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4500 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4500 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.56
Recency 1 April 2010 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron M P4500 has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron M P4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4500
Celeron M P4500
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 11 votes

Rate Celeron M P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 75 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4500 or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.