Opteron 4386 vs Celeron M 925
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2168 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 2.10 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Seoul (2012) |
| Release date | 1 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 925 and Opteron 4386 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 925 and Opteron 4386 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | PGA478 | C32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 925 and Opteron 4386. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 925 and Opteron 4386 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 925 and Opteron 4386. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2011 | 4 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 95 Watt |
Celeron M 925 has 9400% lower power consumption.
Opteron 4386, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron M 925 and AMD Opteron 4386. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 925 is a notebook processor while Opteron 4386 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
