Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U vs Athlon II Neo K345

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II Neo K345
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 1 Watt
0.30
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
3.95
+1217%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U outperforms Athlon II Neo K345 by a whopping 1217% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33691588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon II NeoAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiencyno data28.23
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
Release date18 December 2010 (14 years ago)8 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II Neo K345 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate2000 MHzno data
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache256 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data210 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II Neo K345 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1FP5
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II Neo K345 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II Neo K345 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II Neo K345 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 10 ( - 1300 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II Neo K345 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon II Neo K345 0.30
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 3.95
+1217%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon II Neo K345 527
Samples: 11
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U 6971
+1223%
Samples: 319

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 3.95
Recency 18 December 2010 8 January 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon II Neo K345 has 1400% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U, on the other hand, has a 1216.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon II Neo K345 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II Neo K345
Athlon II Neo K345
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Athlon II Neo K345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 45 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon II Neo K345 and Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.