Opteron 3350 HE vs Celeron M 925
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 925 and Opteron 3350 HE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2044 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.58 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Delhi (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 1 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 925 and Opteron 3350 HE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 925 and Opteron 3350 HE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PGA478 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 925 and Opteron 3350 HE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 925 and Opteron 3350 HE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 925 and Opteron 3350 HE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 925 and Opteron 3350 HE.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2011 | 4 December 2012 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron M 925 has 28.6% lower power consumption.
Opteron 3350 HE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 925 and Opteron 3350 HE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 925 is a notebook processor while Opteron 3350 HE is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 925 and Opteron 3350 HE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
