Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Celeron M 925

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MMobile Athlon 64
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date1 January 2011 (13 years ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128K
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nmno data
Die size107 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478754
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt81 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 81 Watt

Celeron M 925 has 131.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 925 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 925
Celeron M 925
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 925 or Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.