Pentium Dual T4400 vs Celeron M 900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 900
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.08
Pentium Dual Core T4400
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.81
+913%

Pentium Dual Core T4400 outperforms Celeron M 900 by a whopping 913% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 900 and Pentium Dual Core T4400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34022609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Pentium Dual Core
Power efficiency0.222.19
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)1 December 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 900 and Pentium Dual Core T4400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 and Pentium Dual Core T4400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478P
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Pentium Dual Core T4400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 900 and Pentium Dual Core T4400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 900 0.08
Pentium Dual T4400 0.81
+913%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 900 123
Pentium Dual T4400 1284
+944%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 900 2101
Pentium Dual T4400 2231
+6.2%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M 900 1000
Pentium Dual T4400 1897
+89.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 0.81
Recency 1 April 2009 1 December 2009
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2

Pentium Dual T4400 has a 912.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Pentium Dual Core T4400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Pentium Dual Core T4400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 900
Celeron M 900
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400
Pentium Dual Core T4400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 21 vote

Rate Celeron M 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 219 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 900 or Pentium Dual Core T4400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.