Mobile Pentium 4 520 vs Celeron M 900
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Pentium 4 520 outperforms Celeron M 900 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3645 | 3558 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Mobile Pentium 4 |
| Power efficiency | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | 1 April 2009 (16 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 900 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 900 and Mobile Pentium 4 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA478 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 91 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Mobile Pentium 4 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.07 | 0.14 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 91 Watt |
Celeron M 900 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.
Mobile Pentium 4 520, on the other hand, has a 100% higher aggregate performance score.
The Intel Mobile Pentium 4 520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 900 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
