Celeron G6900TE vs M 900

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 900 and Celeron G6900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	2108
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron M	no data
Architecture codename	Penryn (2008−2011)	Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date	1 April 2009 (15 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$70	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 900 and Celeron G6900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Base clock speed	no data	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	80K (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB	1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache	no data	4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	45 nm	10 nm
Die size	107 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	410 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 900 and Celeron G6900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PGA478	1700
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 900 and Celeron G6900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
TSX	-	+

Security technologies

Celeron M 900 and Celeron G6900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

no data

+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 900 and Celeron G6900TE are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 900 and Celeron G6900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel UHD Graphics 710

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 900 and Celeron G6900TE.

PCIe version

no data

5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 April 2009	4 January 2022
Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	45 nm	10 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 900 and Celeron G6900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---