Xeon Gold 5220R vs Celeron M 743
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 5220R outperforms Celeron M 743 by a whopping 12250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3550 | 396 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 6.25 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Intel Xeon Gold |
| Power efficiency | 0.59 | 4.87 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (16 years ago) | 24 February 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $1,555 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron M 743 and Xeon Gold 5220R have a nearly equal value for money.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 743 and Xeon Gold 5220R basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 22 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 24 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 35.75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 86 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 743 and Xeon Gold 5220R compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA965 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and Xeon Gold 5220R. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 743 and Xeon Gold 5220R technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 743 and Xeon Gold 5220R are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 743 and Xeon Gold 5220R. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2667 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 743 and Xeon Gold 5220R.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.14 | 17.29 |
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 24 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
| Threads | 1 | 48 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
Celeron M 743 has 1400% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5220R, on the other hand, has a 12250% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon Gold 5220R is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 743 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 743 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5220R is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
