Ryzen 5 7645HX vs Celeron M 743
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 7645HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 367 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Dragon Range (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 7645HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 6570 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 7645HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA965 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 7645HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 7645HX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 7645HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 7645HX.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 28 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 5 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron M 743 has 450% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 7645HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 7645HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 743 and Ryzen 5 7645HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
