Celeron G440 vs M 743
Aggregate performance score
Celeron G440 outperforms Celeron M 743 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 743 and Celeron G440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3317 | 3145 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.41 | 0.70 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 4 September 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $45 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 743 and Celeron G440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 66 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 743 and Celeron G440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA965 | FCLGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and Celeron G440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 743 and Celeron G440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 743 and Celeron G440 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 743 and Celeron G440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 17 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 743 and Celeron G440 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 743 and Celeron G440.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 0.26 |
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 4 September 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron M 743 has 250% lower power consumption.
Celeron G440, on the other hand, has a 73.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
The Celeron G440 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 743 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron M 743 is a notebook processor while Celeron G440 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 743 and Celeron G440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
